Latest Forum Posts

Page 1 of Cut DVDs

DVDs & Films Forum

Cut DVDs

DVDan (Competent) posted this on Thursday, 8th February 2001, 13:28

The Matrix has had numerous head butts removed from the British Version, because as we all know, a headbutt is alot deadlier than an a machine gun.

Fight Cub had the Angle face beating removed because it was just one beating to many.

And as far as I remeber, Blade has had something like 5 minutes chopped off it.(can anyone tell me what was taken out ? )

What other DVDs out there have cuts to them ?

RE: Cut DVDs

Rich Goodman (Admin) posted this on Thursday, 8th February 2001, 14:44

Check out :-

http://www.ukdvdcuts.co.uk/

Rich

RE: Cut DVDs

Wibble (Competent) posted this on Thursday, 8th February 2001, 16:51

Pitch black is totally uncut...on the unrated version.... Region 1

RE: Cut DVDs

Iain M (Competent) posted this on Friday, 9th February 2001, 13:51

Is Blade cut?

the BBFC doesnt` think so, tho it might have been

RE: Cut DVDs

DVDan (Competent) posted this on Friday, 9th February 2001, 16:28

Yes, I`ve heard Blade has been trimmed from numerous sources.......

and dont listen to the BBCF, they claim that the Matrix was passed un-cut too, which it WAS NOT !

RE: Cut DVDs

RJS (undefined) posted this on Friday, 9th February 2001, 16:32

The BBFC only lists cuts that they have insisted on in order to achieve the rating given, the site won`t list cuts made beforehand by the distributor in order to get the rating they prefer.

In the cinema, the difference between a 12 and 15 certificate can make a big impact on box office takings, hence why studios often pre-cut material before submission. Then when it comes to the video release, they often use the same cinema cut simply to save money and effort restoring cut scenes and having to resubmit it.

RE: Cut DVDs

cw2000 (Competent) posted this on Friday, 9th February 2001, 23:03

THE MATRIX
.
This feature film was classified "15" on 21 May, 1999.
.
>and dont listen to the BBCF, they claim that the Matrix was passed un-cut too, which it WAS NOT !


You mean this that is from the BBFC site:

When classified the work had an approved running time of 136m 0s.
.
The work had a submitted running time of 136m 10s.
.
To obtain this category cuts of 0m 10s were required.


.

At the time of classification Warner Brothers was the distributor of this film.




With the BBFC you have to check the rating for the Film (cinema) version first as these cuts are almost always rolled forward to the video version (video versions normally have as per cinema at the bottom of the page if they were cut but it is sometimes not stated)

Go back to DVDs & Films Forum threads, or All Forum threads