Page 3 of Trial Depp n Ex

One of the larger differences between the two cases, and something anyone would have heard a lot about if they were watching the case, and that's the use of hearsay. In the US, in cases like these, you can't say think like 'Person A told me', as because it's not written down or published anywhere, it's inadmissable, especially in defamation cases.

In the UK, you CAN say 'a source told us', or imply you consider something as true because someone you know told you as much. It'll probably get ripped to shreds in cross-examination, and rightly so, but over here you're allowed to voice a wobbly opinion, wheras in the US you have to state what you know to be true, not just what you think.

At least that's what I've gleaned from listening/reading gumph about the case.

One other aspect of why Johnny lost the UK case was because the Sun, for whatever reason, was allowed to play a large part in telling the lawyers what to say and what to ask. Plus Johnny wasn't 100% invested in the case, and more interested in the early stages of this one.

============================
Writer`s Release

Yes Mr Depp lost in England because
your judge heard enough to say he is
Guilty , his acting maybe better than
Amber , maybe that makes him a
better liar , lol. He has more experience,
In drinking, taking drugs, pretending
being sweet one minute n the next his
Inner monster takes over and that’s what
his fans loves.., sadly no accounting in
Good taste!
Funny I started this topic and one says
We got better things to discuss
Yet not bad turnout 🤓

This item was edited on Saturday, 4th June 2022, 05:43