9 / 10
score
Page 1 Page 2
Jean-Luc Godard’s career has several distinct periods, coinciding with events in his life and around the world. The first spans 1960 to 1965, beginning with À bout de souffle (1960) and ending with Alphaville (1965), with Pierrot le fou (1965) practically a summary of the themes and styles of the films that preceded it and a sign of things to come with Godard’s politicisation.
 
It begins when Ferdinand, a recently fired TV executive, leaving a party because he is bored. Returning home, he gives the babysitter, with whom he had an affair five years ago, a lift back to her apartment. One thing leads to another and, with Marianne on the run from Algerian gangsters, they end up on the road heading south, leaving behind a body with a pair of scissors in its neck.
 
Inline Image

The film is very difficult to explain as Godard is more preoccupied with style than coherent narrative. On the way to the Mediterranean, Marianne and Ferdinand, who she insists on calling ‘Pierrot’, run out of money, so steal cars, petrol and clothes. Godard employs a great deal of voice over which, with the huge ellipses, only serve to confuse and fracture the narrative as you have no idea of the timescale involved.
 
Pierrot le fou is very self-referential with the adventure and romance aspects of À bout de souffle, the chaptering structure of Vivre sa vie: Film en douze tableaux and acknowledging the audience as in Une femme est une femme. The casting was also significant, with the leads played by frequent Godard collaborators Jean-Paul Belmondo and Anna Karina.
 
Inline Image

The film is a fascinating work by a true genius who had already rewritten cinematic language and was now planning on moving on, troubled by the Vietnam War and having had his faith in America, a country he’d previously idolised, shaken.  Godard was also trying to move on from his divorce from Anna Karina, though the dialogue suggests that he was still very much in love with her.
 
It is a film you enjoy and appreciate more if you’ve seen most, or all, of Godard’s work, but works on another level where you can take it on its own merits – you don’t have to get the references, but it helps. I’m no Godard expert and there are some gaps in my viewing that I plan to remedy, but I enjoyed this for what it was: a film with wonderful surreal moments, great direction and superb performances.
 

Previous Page Next PageEdit this item
Bookmark to:
Submit to Slashdot
Submit to Digg
Submit to StumbleUpon
Submit to Google
Submit to Facebook
Submit to Reddit

Comments on this Item

Add Your Own Comment