9 / 10
score
Page 1 Page 2
In Ealing Studios’ long and illustrious existence they produced many classic and highly regarded films. Though they made war films dramas and romances, Ealing is generally associated with comedy and the output under the stewardship of Michael Balcon, including The Man in the White Suit, Kind Hearts and Coronets and The Ladykillers.
 
Written by William Rose, who based the story on a dream he had, the film revolves around a group of criminals who trick an old woman into assisting them in an armed robbery. Led by the mysterious and creepy Professor Marcus, who rents her spare rooms, the gang plans the heist whilst pretending to be a string quintet.
 
Inline Image

After the successful robbery, where they make off with £600,000 using the elderly Mrs. Wilberforce to carry the loot away, everything seems to be going well until the punch-drunk lummox known as ‘One-round’ gets his cello case caught in the door, spills money all over the street and she discovers the truth. With the landlady determined to go to the police and the gang unable to talk her round, they decide the only way to keep her quiet is to kill her.
 
However, the woman’s so sweet and harmless that the criminals really have difficulty getting the nerve to do it and end up turning on each other out of greed, jealousy and that little bit of good that proves to be their undoing...
 
Inline Image

The Ladykillers has always had a special place in my heart as it was the first of the Ealing Comedies that I saw and the one that introduced me to the other delights of the 1940s and ‘50s from the great British studio.  The cast is quite inspired, led by Alec Guinness who is in superb form with a wonderful set of dentures that make him look absolutely grotesque, externalising his mental state.  The Professor’s entrance, in shadow, echoes that of the murderer in M and, in some shots, he even resembles Murnau’s Nosferatu.
 
The supporting cast, with Peter Sellers in his first big role, Herbert Lom and the quite brilliant Katie Johnson are all unbelievably good.  The five gang members are all equally memorable but Johnson just about steals the show as a sweet, lovable walking disaster area who is so innocent and vulnerable that you expect her to be completely manipulated and brushed aside by the criminals so are surprised when she shows the inner steel that comes with being a child of the Victorian age who lived through both World Wars.  There are even small roles for Jack Warner who, after playing Dixon of Dock Green for 21 years, finally gets a promotion here, playing a superintendant and, in one of the more slapstick and farcical scenes, Frankie Howerd appears as a grocer, struggling with a stray horse that’s eating all his produce.
 
Inline Image

It’s hard to describe where the humour comes from and why the film is just so funny as the film is so dark and so difficult to explain without utterly spoiling it but there is something so English about the setting, cast and class of The Ladykillers that even the opening shot of Mrs. Wilberforce leaving her odd detached house at the end of a cul-de-sac that is inexplicably funny.  Perhaps the best explanation for why it’s so hard to describe the humour in The Ladykillers comes from the apocryphal tale of when William Rose had just explained the plot to Michael Balcon who said “Let me get this straight. There are six principle characters, five of them end up dead and this is a comedy?”
 
This is a classic piece of British comedy that really hasn’t aged in the 55 years since it was theatrically released and it shows how difficult the comedy is to pin down that the Coen Brothers, who are immensely skilled filmmakers, failed dismally to capture the humour in their forgettable remake.  I will never tire of watching this film and am glad it’s out on BD.
 

Previous Page Next PageEdit this item
Bookmark to:
Submit to Slashdot
Submit to Digg
Submit to StumbleUpon
Submit to Google
Submit to Facebook
Submit to Reddit

Comments on this Item

ChangesPosted by Stuart McLean on 17-2-2010 20:00

Hi David - I agree wholeheartedly with every aspect of your review except one: the picture quality. I would say that this is only marginally better than the DVD I have when viewed on the same equipment. It has nothing of the crisp detailed clarity that we have come to expect from this series. (I have just watched 'The Go Between' and it is a much superior transfer. Also - the clean up you mention> I don't believe that this is a print clean up at all, but rather a digital clean up of an already transferred tape master. (The givaway was the green flecks and drop out).

Apart from that ...I'm with you. Possibly a top ten movie. Yo ucan see whay the Coen brothers were seduced into an ill-fated re-make.

ChangesPosted by David Beckett on 18-2-2010 12:16

I agree that the picture isn't close to reference quality and is quite soft, I do believe that it is probably as good as it can look and wouldn't look any better in the cinema.  The film stock is probably not the greatest so any restoration can only do so much.  Don't forget that The Go Between is 15 years younger and was possibly better quality to begin with.  At least they've got it in the proper aspect ratio for once!

ChangesPosted by Stuart McLean on 18-2-2010 23:21

The anorak/Sherlock Holmes in me wants to knock on Optimum's door (just behind Carnaby Street i noticed the other day) and quiz the person responsible for the restoration. Here's my theory: they still possess a digital tape (probably Digi-Beta) of the transfer commissioned for their initial licencing for the Studio Canal DVD.  During a discussion about using that tape to re-encode at a higher bit rate (HD) someone has suggested cleaning it up. It' s been digitised into an HD Avid suite (or Final Cut) and some grading software has been used as well as photoshop to eradicate the drop out and blips etc on the original master tape. This has improved the look of the original transfer but NOT the quality of that which, as you say, looks soft. The result is an HD encoding of a cleaned up telecine transfer tape that wasn't particularly well done at the outset. The film isn't that old that a pristine transfer wouldn't be possible. There are probbaly several negatives around just waiting for reprocessing and transfer...but that costs big bucks. I just think it's a shame that such a great film won't get that level of loving care and attention. Having said that, you're quite right in saying that this is the best yet.

ChangesPosted by David Beckett on 21-2-2010 16:03

If you have a few days free, don a deerstalker, light a pipe and let me know what you find out!

ChangesPosted by Stuart McLean on 21-2-2010 16:46

It's a shame that we don't hear more from Mr. Mark Oates. He was a wonder at figuring these things out. Perhaps I could be a Watson to his Holmes? Just a thought...or am I getting carried away? 'Calm down dear - it's only a blu-ray'!

Add Your Own Comment